Penggunaan Dosimeter Film,OSL,Dioda, dan Ion Chamber dalam Verifikasi Dosis pada Teknik Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT)
Abstract
The Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique is an advanced radiotherapy method that allows more optimal radiation dose distribution in a shorter radiation time. Several types of dosimeters that are often used for this verification include film dosimeters, OSL (Optically Stimulated Luminescence), diodes, and ion chambers, each of which has advantages and disadvantages. This review was conducted to compare the use of various dosimeters in dose verification using the VMAT technique, with a focus on the advantages and disadvantages of each tool. This research is based on a literature study of 15 articles. The literature study was carried out for 2 months. The article is limited to a discussion of environmental influences on air quality. The articles used were taken from 2015 to 2023. The results of this study show that although all types of dosimeters have advantages, selecting the right dosimeter is very dependent on the specific needs in dose verification on VMAT. Diodes, ion chambers, OSLs, and films perform well in appropriate application contexts, but each has limitations in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and measurement time. The articles discussed show that OSL and film are more effective in dose measurements in three-dimensional distribution, while diodes and ion chambers are more appropriate for point dose measurements.
Downloads
References
[2] S. Prasath, “Dosimetric Validation of Treatment Planning System for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Using AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.b,” Research Article, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1715-1723, 2024.
[3] P. Szeverinski, “Error sensitivity of a log file analysis tool compared with a helical diode array dosimeter for VMAT delivery quality assurance,” RADIATION ONCOLOGY PHYSICS , vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 163-171, 2020.
[4] P. Kazantsev, “IAEA methodology for on-site end-to-end IMRT/VMAT audits: an international pilot study,” Acta Oncologica, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 141-148, 2020.
[5] A. M. Cardona, “Experimental determination of breast skin dose using volumetric modulated arc therapy and field-in-field treatment techniques,” Journal of Radiotherapy in, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2022.
[6] S. Piffer, “Validation of a secondary dose check tool against Monte Carlo and analytical clinical dose calculation algorithms in VMAT,” RADIATION ONCOLOGY PHYSICS, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 52-62, 2021.
[7] J. Kim, Physica Medica, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 125-132, 2020.
[8] P. Kumar, “Multi-institutional dose audit in radiotherapy facilities using in-house developed optically stimulated luminescence disc dosimeters,” Original Article, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 361-169, 2023.
[9] P. Kumar, “PATIENT-SPECIFIC DOSIMETRY USING IN-HOUSE DEVELOPED OSL DISC DOSEMETERS,” Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-9, 2020.
[10] S. M. Kelly, “Radiotherapy quality assurance in paediatric clinical trials: first report from six QUARTET-affiliated trials,” Original Article, vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2023.
[11] Y. Zhou, “Impact of setup errors on multi‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy for craniospinal irradiation,” RADIATION ONCOLOGY PHYSICS, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 115-123, 2020.
[12] R. Kumari, “Multi-Detector in Vivo Dosimetry of Volumetric Arcs of Total Body Irradiation: An Institutional Comparative Study,” Journal Of Medicinal and Chemical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2964-2973, 2023.
[13] V. Mishra, “The retrospective observational study compares dosimetry of Heart and Left Anterior Descending Artery Exposure in Carcinoma Esophagus Patients: Volumetric Arc Therapy vs. Intensity- Modulated Radiotherapy,” Original Article, vol. 6, no. 17, pp. 1-9, 2023.
[14] V. Peppa, “Dose delivery uncertainties assessment in the field junction region of craniospinal irradiation with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy using a robustness index and experimental dose verification,” PLOS ONE, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1-25, 2024.
[15] R. Kumari, “Comparison of Different Dosimetric Indices for Volumetric Arc Modulated Treatment Planning Using Two Different Treatment Planning Systems: A Feasibility Study for Total Body Irradiation,” Research Article, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 483-489, 2023.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
