Application of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for the Numerical Solution of the Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30872/6881zx10Keywords:
Physics-Informed Neural Networks, Schrodinger Equation, Quantum Harmonic Oscillator, Eigenvalue Approximation, Numerical Quantum SimulationAbstract
This work investigates the application of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for numerical solutions to the time-independent Schrödinger equation of the quantum harmonic oscillator in one, two, and three spatial dimensions. Fully connected neural architectures are constructed to approximate wavefunctions over finite symmetric domains, while the corresponding energy eigenvalues are treated as trainable parameters. The training strategy utilizes randomly sampled interior points to enforce the Schrödinger operator residual and boundary points to impose vanishing wavefunction constraints. For the 1D quantum harmonic oscillator, the learned ground-state wavefunction yields an energy of E = 1.2939 after 12,000 iterations. In the 2D configuration, convergence is achieved at E = 2.1352 within 14,000 iterations, whereas the 3D model attains E = 2.6377 after 12,000 iterations. These values agree with the expected trend of increasing ground-state energy with dimensionality, although deviations from exact analytical values indicate that PINNs may experience optimization challenges and sensitivity to sampling density and boundary enforcement. Despite these limitations, the trained models successfully capture the characteristic spatial symmetries and Gaussian-like envelope of harmonic oscillator eigenstates across all dimensions. These findings demonstrate that PINNs offer a flexible, mesh-free alternative for solving stationary quantum systems, particularly when analytical or conventional numerical approaches become impractical. The method shows strong potential for higher-dimensional quantum applications, even though further refinement such as improved sampling, loss balancing, and network depth remains necessary to suppress residual error and enhance eigenvalue accuracy.
Downloads
References
[1] D. J. Griffiths, R. College, F. Darrell, and R. College, “Introduction to Quantum Mechanics,” no. November, pp. 9–10, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316995433
[2] L. Brevi, A. Mandarino, and E. Prati, “A Tutorial on the Use of Physics-Informed Neural Networks to Compute the Spectrum of Quantum Systems,” 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12100174
[3] P. Vetter et al., “Report Decoding Natural Sounds in Early ‘“ Visual ”’ Cortex of Congenitally Blind Individuals ll ll Decoding Natural Sounds in Early ‘“ Visual ”’ Cortex of Congenitally Blind Individuals,” pp. 3039–3044, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.05.071.
[4] Z. Ren, S. Zhou, D. Liu, and Q. Liu, “applied sciences Physics-Informed Neural Networks : A Review of Methodological Evolution , Theoretical Foundations , and Interdisciplinary Frontiers Toward Next-Generation Scientific Computing,” vol. M, pp. 1–17, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148092
[5] S. Wu, A. Zhu, Y. Tang, and B. Lu, “Convergence of Physics-Informed Neural Networks Applied to Linear Second-Order Elliptic Interface Problems,” vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 596–627, 2023, doi: 10.4208/cicp.OA-2022-0218. https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.OA-2022-0218
[6] P. Pantidis, H. Eldababy, C. M. Tagle, and M. E. Mobasher, “Error convergence and engineering-guided hyperparameter search of PINNs: Towards optimized I-FENN performance”. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.03918
[7] S. Universit, “CONVERGENCE AND ERROR ANALYSIS OF PINNS,” pp. 1–56, 2022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.01240
[8] M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks : A Deep Learning Framework for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems Involving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations”. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
[9] K. Luo, J. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Li, and J. Wen, “Physics-informed neural networks for PDE problems : a comprehensive review,” 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11322-7
[10] S. Sarkar, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks for One-Dimensional Quantum Well Problems,” pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.05367
[11] N. Hoffmann, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks as Solvers for the Time-Dependent Schrödinger Equation”. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.12522
[12] S. Shi, D. Liu, R. Ji, and Y. Han, “An Adaptive Physics-Informed Neural Network with Two-Stage Learning Strategy to Solve Partial Differential Equations,” vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 298–299, 2023, doi: 10.4208/nmtma.OA-2022-0063. https://doi.org/10.4208/nmtma.OA-2022-0063
[13] H. Petzka and C. Sminchisescu, “Non-attracting Regions of Local Minima in Deep and Wide Neural Networks,” vol. 22, pp. 1–34, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.06486
[14] T. De Ryck, “arXiv : 2402 . 10926v1 [ math . NA ] 30 Jan 2024 Numerical analysis of physics-informed neural networks and related models in physics-informed machine learning”. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492923000089
[15] Z. Hu, “Tackling the Curse of Dimensionality with Physics-Informed Neural Networks,” pp. 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106369
[16] M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks : A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 378, pp. 686–707, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045.
[17] E. Solano and C. Flores-garrigos, “P -i n n,” pp. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.04434
[18] B. Das, T. Wang, and G. Dai, “Asymptotic Behavior of Common Connections in Sparse,” pp. 1–21, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.08472
[19] P. Virtanen et al., “SciPy 1 . 0 — Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python,” pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
[20] R. Cass, T. V. A. N. D. E. N. Hove, and J. Scholbach, “Central motives on parahoric flag varieties”. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.11007
[21] D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter, “INTRODUCTION TO Quantum Mechanics Third edition”. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316995433
[22] H. Jin, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Quantum Eigenvalue Problems”. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.00451
[23] J. Wang, “An Optimistic Acceleration of AMSGrad for Nonconvex Optimization,” 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.01435
[24] A. Celaya, D. Fuentes, and B. Riviere, “Informed Neural Networks via the QR Discrete,” pp. 1–34. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.07700
[25] X. P. Selection, “PINNACLE : PINN A DAPTIVE C OL L OCATION,” pp. 1–36, 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.07662
[26] C. Methods, A. Mech, Z. Hu, K. Kawaguchi, Z. Zhang, and G. Em, “Tackling the curse of dimensionality in fractional and tempered fractional PDEs with physics-informed neural networks,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 432, no. PB, p. 117448, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2024.117448.
[27] I. Conference and M. Springer, “This is a repository copy of Investigating Guiding Information for Adaptive Collocation Point Sampling in PINNs . White Rose Research Online URL for this paper : Version : Accepted Version Part III . International Conference on Computational Science ( ICCS ) 2024 : 24th personal use . Not for redistribution . The definitive Version of Record was published in Investigating Guiding Information for Adaptive Collocation Point Sampling in PINNs,” 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63759-9_36
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Progressive Physics Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

