Perbandingan Kinerja Dosimeter TLD dan OSL pada Pengukuran Dosis di Radiologi Diagnostik

Muhammad Ridho; Retno Nur Okta Viana; Natalia Pata'dungan; Erlinda Ratnasari Putri

doi:10.30872/ppj.v5i2.1445

Muhammad Ridho Universitas Mulawarman
Retno Nur Okta Viana Universitas Mulawarman
Natalia Pata'dungan Universitas Mulawarman
Erlinda Ratnasari Putri Universitas Mulawarman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/ppj.v5i2.1445

Abstract

Radiation dose measurement is crucial for ensuring the safety and optimization of radiology practices. Dose measurement in diagnostic radiology involves a systematic process aimed at accurately quantifying the radiation doses used during radiological procedures, ensuring compliance with safety guidelines. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) dosimeters and Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLD) in measuring radiation doses during diagnostic radiology procedures. The study utilized a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom to simulate the human body. Both OSL and TLD dosimeters were employed to measure radiation doses under clinical exposure conditions. The data collected from both dosimeter types were compared to assess their accuracy, efficiency, and effectiveness in different radiological settings. The results show that OSL dosimeters offer higher sensitivity and faster reading times compared to TLDs. OSL dosimeters also demonstrate a higher level of precision, which is crucial for optimizing radiological procedures. While TLDs still provide reliable results, they require more preparation time and a longer reading process. OSL dosimeters are superior to TLDs in terms of efficiency, sensitivity, and speed, making them a preferred choice for radiation dose measurement in diagnostic radiology and contributing to safer and more accurate radiology practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] E. Hiswara, D. Kartikasari, N. Nuraeni, H. Sofyan, dan M. Sukri, ”Dosis Radiasi Pekerja dan Pasien Pada Tindakan Intervensi Di RSUP Dr. M. Djamil, Padang,” Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 39-47, 2022.

[2] A. D. Fanis, D. Milvita, dan N. Nuraeni, ”Estimasi Dosis Radiasi Pada Lensa Mata Menggunakan TLD-100 Terhadap Pasien Brain Scanning CT-Scan Merek Siemens Somatom Perspective,” Jurnal Fisika Unand, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 83-89, 2022.

[3] N. H. M. Jamal, I. S. Sayed, dan W. S. Syed, ”Estimation of organ absorbed dose in pediatric chest X-ray examination: A phantom study,” Elsevier, vol. 166, no. 108472, pp. 1-6, 2020.

[4] F. Panahi, M. Mohammadi, F. Naserpour, N. Hassanpour, dan M. Gholami, ”Entrance dose determination and effective dose calculation in chest and skull radiographies: anexperimental and computational study,” International Journal of Radiation Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 899-906, 2021.

[5] C. A. Akan, H. Gümüş, dan H. Akan, ”Radiation exposure of patients and staff working in angiography and interventional radiology unit,” Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1-4, 2020.

[6] R. A. Ernando, V. I. Giovanni, F. Ramadana, S. Oktamuliana, H. Sofyan, ”Analisis Dosis Efektif Organ Paru Pasien Thoraks Menggunakan Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter (OSLD),” JoP, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 7-12, 2022.

[7] N. Miyaji et al., ”Determination of a reliable assessment for occupational eye lens dose in nuclear medicine,” Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1-10, 2022.

[8] I. S. Sayed, N. S. Roslan, dan W. S. Syed, ”Entrance Skin Dose (ESD) and Bucky Table Induced Backscattered Dose (BTI-BSD) in Abdominal Radiography With nanoDot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter (OSLD),” Cureus, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1-11, 2023.

[9] M. T. Saidin et al., ”Dosimetric Assessment of Routine X-Ray Examination at Selected Health Clinics in Perak Using Commercialized Optically-Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter (OSLD),” Atom Indonesia, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 213-218, 2021.

[10] N. N. H. Ramli et al., ”Characterization of amorphous thermoluminescence dosimeters for patient dose measurement in X-ray diagnostic procedures,” Elsevier, vol. 116, no. 101016, pp. 130-134, 2020.

[11] O. E. Belhaj et al., ”Dose metrology: TLD/OSL dose accuracy and energy response performance,” Elsevier, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 717-724, 2023.

[12] S. F. Kry et al., "AAPM TG 191: Clinical use of luminescent dosimeters: TLDs and OSLDs," American Association of Physicists in Medicine, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 19-51, 2020.

[13] P. T. Vinanda, D. Milvita, dan H. Sofyan, "Perbandingan Tangkapan Dosis Radiasi OSLD nanoDots, TLD-100, dan TLD-100H pada Pemeriksaan Foto Thorax Pasien Anak," Jurnal Fisika Unand, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 137-141, 2021.

[14] A. D. Omojola, M. O. Akpochafor, S. O. Adeneye, I. O. Akala, dan A. A. Agboje, "Chest X‐rays of newborns in a medical facility: variation between the entrance skin dose measurements using the indirect and direct methods for clinical dose audit," Japanese Journal of Radiology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 219-225, 2022.

[15] Samsun, E. P. Syarif, Sriyatun, G. Winarno, dan A. Sasongko, "Analysis of Scattered Radiation Dose In Cardiac Catheterization Examination In The CATHLAB Room Using TLD," Asian Journal of Engineering, vol. 2, no. 11 pp. 1531-1536, 2023.